介绍：说唱王戴夫迎来第三季戴夫将举办他的首次巡演，并一路寻找爱情。然而在他和伙伴们穿梭于美国各地的过程中，他们亲身发现了美国真实多样的文化图景，以及名气常给爱情和友谊带来的压力。

介绍：亚历山大·斯特恩，又名艾斯，是一名私家侦探，有一位非常要好的小兄弟玛克bbb一日，日本人村田找到他，雇佣他寻找一位老妇人，要和她进行一笔房产交易，但是老妇人在克鲁律师的协助下，已经将房产卖给其他人。r日本人又盯上另一处房产，房产的主人便是玛克丝的外祖父格诺，但是格诺在去往律师事务所的途中被人杀害，艾斯亲眼目睹了这一切。格诺的继承人是玛克丝的母亲格蒂——一个患有精神病的妇人，不幸的是，格蒂也被神秘暗杀了，而艾斯仍旧是目击者。r玛克丝成了唯一的合法继承人，而他似乎正被克鲁律师所控制，艾斯要救他的兄弟于危难之中，没想到，自己却无故进了警察局，接受审讯。与此同时，玛克丝已将房产卖给了村田，准备带着钱环游世界，愿望没达成，他被克鲁的人杀死了。r艾斯以为这一切结束了，这时，克鲁出现了，他告诉艾斯，其实，玛克丝才是真正的幕后黑手……

介绍：描述查理布朗和小狗史诺比等一群朋友，以交换学生身份前往法国留学，由于文化背景和生活习惯不同，产生了很多欧洲风味的笑料，相当幽默逗趣

介绍：萊恩年僅五歲的女兒米亞慘遭殺害，警方偵辦多時，卻無絲毫線索，萊恩只好靠自己之力進行調查某夜，他透過窗外，發現住在他附近一名叫格蘭傑的男子，手上把玩著米亞最喜歡的蝴蝶髮夾，警方經過大肆搜索卻怎樣也找不到髮夾，沒有任何事證，這點讓警方束手無策。然而，萊恩堅信他就是兇手，於是動手綁架了格蘭傑，沒想到不管動用何種酷刑都不能讓格蘭傑招供，就在萊恩的信念開始動搖時，鎮上又發生了另一起女童被擄的案件，五歲的克拉拉命在旦夕，萊恩能拯救另一條無辜的性命嗎？

介绍：Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.　　Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)　　As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisonerpenitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone (I'm a mechanic), yet the symbolism is rich he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.　　The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . You need a woman not a girl) is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly arty and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual am notare too argument).　　Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the unbelievable truth of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.