介绍：姑母意外死亡，给美丽、善良的少女宝拉（英格丽·褒曼 Ingrid Bergman 饰）留下大笔遗产，引来心术不正的青年安东（查尔斯·博耶 Charles Boyer 饰）觊觎追求宝拉成功后，二人回到宝拉姑母曾经遇害的伦敦旧宅居住。本以为就此拥有完美丈夫和幸福生活的宝拉，逐渐受到古怪现象困扰，她总会听到奇怪的响声，东西经常莫名其妙消失又出现，新来的女仆也对她态度轻蔑，煤气灯也开始忽明忽暗，安东暗示一切都是宝拉自己的幻觉，是宝拉的精神出现了问题。就在宝拉慢慢心理崩溃，濒临发疯的边缘，一个年轻的侦探伯林（约瑟夫·科顿 Joseph Cotten 饰）出现了，他发现宝拉正在被孤立，背后的主谋正是她的完美丈夫……

介绍：卖花女伊莉莎.杜利特尔，长得眉清目秀，聪明乖巧，但出身寒微，家境贫寒她每天到街头叫卖鲜花，赚点钱补贴家用。一天，伊莉莎低俗的嗓音引起了语言学家希金斯教授的注意，教授夸口只要经过他的训练，卖花女也可以成为贵夫人。伊莉莎觉得教授说的话对她是一个机会，就主动上门请求教授训练她。教授的朋友皮克林和他打赌，如果让伊莉莎以贵夫人的身份出席6个月后将举办的大使游园会而不被人识破真相，那么皮克林愿意承担一切试验费用和伊莉莎的学费，这激起了教授的斗志，希金斯欣然接受了挑战。他是不甘示弱的，他从最基本的字母发音开始教起。希金斯是个精力旺盛和讲究科学的学者，对每一感兴趣件事都能废寝忘食。他胸怀坦荡、丝毫不怀任何恶意，但他又像孩子一样，毫不顾及他人的感情，对伊莉莎严加训练。

介绍：在立志成为画家之前，梵高（柯克·道格拉斯 Kirk Douglas 饰）曾经是画廊里颇有前途的售画员，经过几次情感失败之后，他开始尝试成为一名画家梵高悲天悯人的性格让他能与贫穷矿工们和谐相处，用画笔描绘他们的悲惨生活。他的画奔放热情、情感肆意，但却得不到主流画坛的欣赏。梵高邀请当时正崛起的印象派画家高更（安东尼·奎恩 Anthony Quinn 饰）一同去法国南方作画。多年来，弟弟提奥一直在经济上支持梵高，甚至为他资助高更去南方的所有费用。刚开始两人其乐融融，一起创作了很多高水准的作品，但因两人的个性互不相容，逐渐产生激烈争吵。高更试图离开，梵高为此精神受打击，试图持刀威胁高更，高更仓皇而逃，梵高最终自残割下了自己的耳朵。孤独、贫困的梵高受精神病所折磨，几度进入病院疗养。而他始终没有停止绘画，一直在等待大众的赏识，最终精神崩毁，开枪结束了生命。　　安东尼·奎因凭此片荣获第29届奥斯卡金像奖最佳男配角。

介绍：In Alexandria, in 1938, Darley, a young British schoolmaster and poet, makes friends through Pursewarden, the British consular officer, with Justine, the beautiful and mysterious wife of a Coptic banker. He observes the affairs of her heart and incidentally discovers that she is involved in a plot against the British, meant to arm the Jewish underground in Palestine. The plot finally fails, Justine is sent to jail and Darley decides to return to England.　　- Written by Guy Bellinger （From IMDb）

介绍：In a confused welter of artistic licence, this is the classical music biopic which makes 'Song to Remember'look like a masterpiece. Bogarde succeeds in diminishing the reputation of the musical colossus who spanned European music for most of the 19th Century. The absurdities of the plot, the sequoia-like quality of the acting and the prevalence of historical,musical and linguistic anachronisms combine to elevate this offering to the status of an A1 turkey.How a pianist of the stature of Bolet came to be mixed up in this fiasco can only be guessed at. The characterisation of Liszt fails to convey even a minute impression of his magnetic personality and the overwhelming effect that he had on not only his audiences, but also his pianistic rivals.Clara Schumann herself said that 'we toil over that which Liszt reads at sight!' Whilst the emphasis seems to focus on his romantic prowess,rather than his status as the greatest pianist of the century or,arguably, of all time, one feels,nevertheless, that this was an opportunity lost.